The woman who tugged at America’s heartstrings over a Target theft now faces backlash after video surfaces showing her fully competent at Orlando International Airport—and donors want answers about that $5,600 GoFundMe
“She Played Us All”: New Airport Footage of Imarah Aaliyah Bryan Sparks Fraud Accusations After Viral Target Case
Two weeks ago, the internet rallied behind Imarah Aaliyah Bryan. The 26-year-old Orlando woman appeared in court looking confused and disoriented after spending 50 days in jail for allegedly stealing $145 worth of merchandise from Target. Viral videos showed her standing silently next to her lawyer, seemingly unable to comprehend what was happening. Social media exploded with outrage, thousands donated to her GoFundMe, and Target became public enemy number one.
Now? Those same supporters are calling her a fraud.
New footage has emerged showing Bryan at Orlando International Airport just weeks before the Target incident, and she appears fully competent, articulate, and aware of her actions. The video, which is rapidly spreading across social media, shows a completely different woman from the one who stood confused in that courtroom. She’s arguing with airport employees, refusing to comply with officers, and showing zero signs of the cognitive impairment that sparked nationwide sympathy.
RELATED: GoFundMe Launched for Imarah Aaliyah Bryan After Orlando Target Arrest
The GoFundMe that raised over $5,600? SHUT DOWN. All donations returned. And the internet? Absolutely furious.
“She deserves an Oscar,” one former supporter commented. Another wrote: “I actually cried watching her court video. Now I feel like an idiot.”
The Original Story That Broke Our Hearts
Let’s rewind to understand why this reversal feels like such a betrayal.
On September 20, 2025, a video of Bryan’s court appearance went viral. She had been arrested in May for allegedly attempting to steal $145 worth of items from the Target at 4650 Millenia Plaza Way in Orlando. Unable to post bail, she sat in jail for nearly 50 days before finally seeing a judge.
In the courtroom footage that millions watched, Bryan appeared to have significant cognitive delays. She stood silently, barely responding to the judge’s questions, seemingly unable to grasp the severity of her situation. Her public defender spoke for her as she entered a no-contest plea. Many viewers immediately identified signs they believed indicated autism spectrum disorder or other developmental disabilities.
@thetalkloungeofficial #UPDATE ♬ original sound – Thetalklounge
The judge sentenced her to time served but ordered her to pay $339.70 to the Orlando Police Department, $500 in bail, and banned her from returning to that Target location. She walked out of court with nearly $1,000 in debt and a criminal record.
Social media erupted. Comments poured in:
KEESLAYEDYA: “F*ck Target!! 🎯”
Britni Knighten: “I will never shop at target again! Ever!”
tattianawilliams1: “She should NOT be in jail!!!!!!!”
slim💕love26: “She doesn’t even know what’s going on how can this happen 🥺”
traceynicole1st: “Shame on her lawyer for not advocating for this young lady.🤬”
Amanda Panda: “She doesn’t understand..she was told what to say. My daughter is just like her. While she can speak..she doesn’t understand context, nuance, and half of what’s being spoken. This breaks my heart.”
The outrage wasn’t just about Bryan, it became a lightning rod for conversations about disability rights, criminal justice reform, and how society treats its most vulnerable members.
Dr. Marcus Williams, a clinical psychologist who specializes in developmental disabilities, watched the original court video and told us at the time:
“If this woman genuinely has cognitive impairments, jailing her for 50 days over petty theft is a failure of our entire system. She needed support services, not incarceration.”
Target faced calls for boycotts. The judge was criticized. The public defender was slammed for not advocating harder. And perhaps most significantly, a GoFundMe campaign was launched.
The GoFundMe That Raised Thousands
Deanna Carroll, a stranger moved by Bryan’s story, created a GoFundMe titled “Support Imarah Aaliyah Bryan: Help Her Move Forward.” The campaign’s goal was simple: help Bryan cover her court fees and provide financial relief as she rebuilt her life.
“This is about giving Imarah a second chance and showing her she’s not alone,” Carroll wrote on the campaign page.
The response was immediate and overwhelming. Within days, the fundraiser had raised $5,651 from hundreds of donors who believed they were helping a vulnerable woman who’d been failed by the system.
Comments on the GoFundMe reflected genuine compassion:
“This poor woman shouldn’t have spent one day in jail.”
“Praying for you, Imarah. You deserve better.”
“The system failed you, but we won’t.”
At the time, it felt like the best of humanity coming together to right a wrong. Carroll even temporarily paused donations because the outpouring was so significant.
But then the airport video surfaced.
The Airport Incident Nobody Knew About
Here’s what supporters didn’t know when they were opening their wallets: Bryan had been arrested once before—at Orlando International Airport, approximately one month before the Target incident.
According to police reports, Bryan was charged with battery on an airport employee. While details of exactly what transpired remain limited, newly surfaced video footage from that day tells a dramatically different story than the one the courtroom video suggested.
In the airport footage, Bryan appears fully competent and aware. She’s articulate. She argues with airport staff. When officers arrive, she’s non-compliant, tugging away from them, raising her voice. There’s no confusion, no apparent cognitive impairment, no signs of someone who doesn’t understand what’s happening around her.
Witnesses at the airport gave statements describing her as difficult, confrontational, and fully capable of understanding what officers were telling her. One airport employee stated that Bryan knew exactly what she was doing and showed no signs of needing assistance or accommodation.
The contrast between this footage and the courtroom appearance is stark—and that’s putting it mildly.
Social media investigator and content creator @JusticeWatchdog, who has over 500K followers, broke down the two videos side by side: “Look at her body language in the airport. She’s assertive, argumentative, making direct eye contact. Then look at the courtroom footage. She’s docile, confused, almost childlike. Either she had a massive cognitive decline in one month, or something else is going on here.“
The Backlash: “We’ve Been Played”
When the airport footage hit social media, the response was swift and brutal.
Former supporters felt betrayed. The comments section on The Talk Lounge’s TikTok, which had been filled with sympathy two weeks ago, turned into a different kind of outrage entirely:
“So she was faking the whole time? Are you KIDDING me?”
“I donated $50 to her GoFundMe. I want my money back.”
“This is why people stop helping others. Because of scammers like this.”
“Give her that Oscar. She earned it with that performance.”
“My autistic son would NEVER fake his disability for sympathy. This is disgusting.”
That last comment hits particularly hard. Parents of children with genuine disabilities expressed feeling especially betrayed, noting that Bryan’s alleged deception makes it harder for people who actually need help to be taken seriously.
Disability rights advocate Sarah Chen, who initially spoke out in support of Bryan, released a statement: “If these allegations are true, this is deeply harmful to the disability community. We fight every day for people to take cognitive disabilities seriously, to ensure accommodations in the legal system, to prevent exactly the kind of injustice we thought we saw. If this was an act, it undermines every legitimate case and reinforces harmful stereotypes that people fake disabilities for sympathy or advantage.”
The GoFundMe Gets Shut Down—All Money Returned
Once the airport footage went viral, Deanna Carroll made the decision to shut down the GoFundMe campaign and return all $5,651 to donors.
In a brief statement on the now-deleted campaign page, Carroll wrote: “In light of new information that has come to our attention, we are refunding all donations. We apologize to everyone who contributed in good faith.”
For many donors, getting their money back isn’t enough. They feel manipulated, used, and angry that their genuine compassion may have been exploited.
“It’s not even about the $20 I donated,”
one former supporter wrote.
“It’s about the fact that I cried watching her court video. I called my mom about it. I shared it with everyone I knew. And now I feel like a complete fool.”
Financial fraud investigator Robert Martinez explains the broader implications: “If someone deliberately misrepresents their circumstances to solicit donations, that can constitute fraud. The fact that the organizer returned the money shows good faith on their part, but it doesn’t change the fact that people were potentially deceived. If prosecutors wanted to pursue this, they could argue that fraudulent misrepresentation was used to obtain those funds, even if they were ultimately returned.”
Was It All an Act? The Evidence Mounts
Let’s look at what we know:
April 2025: Bryan is arrested at Orlando International Airport for battery on an employee. Video shows her appearing fully competent, argumentative, and non-compliant with officers.
May 2025: Approximately one month later, Bryan is arrested at Target for allegedly attempting to steal $145 worth of merchandise.
May-September 2025: Bryan spends 50 days in jail, unable to post bail.
September 20, 2025: Bryan appears in court, looking confused and cognitively impaired. The video goes viral, sparking nationwide outrage and sympathy.
September 2025: A GoFundMe raises over $5,600 in days.
October 2025: Airport footage surfaces showing Bryan appearing fully competent. GoFundMe shuts down, returns all money. Accusations of fraud spread.
The timeline raises serious questions. How does someone go from competent and confrontational in April to appearing significantly cognitively impaired in September? What changed?
Former prosecutor Jennifer Liu weighs in: “Defendants sometimes present differently in court, especially if they’re scared or overwhelmed. That’s normal. But the level of difference between these two videos is unusual. In my 15 years as a prosecutor, I’ve seen defendants try to appear more sympathetic, but this would be an extreme example if it was intentional. The question is: was this a genuine stress response that made her appear more impaired than she is, or was it a calculated performance?”
The Legal Implications
Here’s where things get murky from a legal standpoint.
Bryan’s attorney never explicitly stated she had a diagnosed disability. The court never ordered a competency evaluation. The no-contest plea she entered is valid whether she has cognitive impairments or not.
The viral video that sparked the initial outrage was based on public perception and assumption—not official diagnoses or court determinations. Viewers saw what appeared to be cognitive impairment and ran with that narrative. Media coverage, including our original article, reflected that public perception.
But if Bryan was capable of understanding the proceedings and chose to present herself as more impaired than she actually is, did she do anything illegal? The answer is complicated.
“Faking a disability isn’t inherently a crime,” explains legal analyst David Thompson. “But if you use that false representation to obtain money or benefits you’re not entitled to—like GoFundMe donations based on a misleading portrayal that crosses into fraud territory. The challenge is proving intent. Did she deliberately mislead people, or did observers simply misinterpret what they saw?”
As for the GoFundMe money being returned, that likely shields both Bryan and the campaign organizer from fraud charges. But it doesn’t erase the ethical breach if deception occurred.
The Disability Community Speaks Out
Perhaps the most significant damage is to the disability rights community, which rallied behind Bryan’s case as an example of systemic injustice.
Autism advocate Michael Torres, whose organization works to ensure proper accommodations in legal proceedings, released a statement: “We were ready to use this case as a catalyst for reform. We were prepared to fight for changes to ensure people with cognitive disabilities receive proper support in the criminal justice system. If this was all theater, it doesn’t just hurt those of us who advocated for Ms. Bryan, it hurts every single person with a legitimate disability who will now face increased skepticism when they ask for help.”
The concern is real. Every time someone fakes a disability for sympathy or advantage, it makes society more skeptical of genuine cases. Parents of autistic children worry their kids won’t be believed. People with invisible disabilities fear being accused of exaggerating.
Dr. Rachel Morrison, who researches disability representation in media, notes: “This is why representation matters so much. When disabilities are faked or exaggerated for sympathy, it reinforces the harmful idea that disability is performative rather than a genuine lived experience. It sets back years of advocacy work.”
What Happens Next?
As of now, Bryan has not publicly addressed the airport footage or the accusations of fraud. Attempts to reach her for comment have been unsuccessful.
The Orlando Police Department confirmed they have received inquiries about potential fraud related to the GoFundMe campaign but declined to comment on whether an investigation is ongoing.
Target, which faced massive backlash and boycott threats two weeks ago, has not issued any new statements. The company likely feels vindicated but is smart enough not to gloat publicly.
For the thousands of people who donated, shared, and advocated for Bryan, there’s a lingering sense of betrayal mixed with caution. Many are expressing that they’ll be more skeptical before jumping on the next viral outrage bandwagon.
“I learned my lesson,” one former supporter wrote. “Next time, I’m waiting for all the facts before I donate or share. This hurt.”
The Bigger Question: What Did We Learn?
This case should serve as a sobering reminder about the speed and consequences of viral outrage in the social media age.
Within hours of the original court video surfacing, millions of people had formed opinions, opened wallets, and declared boycotts, all based on a two-minute clip and assumptions about what they were seeing.
Nobody waited for medical records. Nobody asked if there had been a competency evaluation. Nobody looked into Bryan’s history or previous arrests. The narrative fit perfectly into existing conversations about disability rights and criminal justice reform, so it spread like wildfire.
Media literacy expert Dr. Angela Rodriguez notes: “This is the danger of trial by social media. We see a sympathetic figure, we hear a compelling narrative, and we react emotionally before we have complete information. The problem is that once the initial story goes viral, the correction or update never gets the same attention. Millions saw the courtroom video. How many will see the airport footage?”
That’s perhaps the most important question. Will the people who boycotted Target go back? Will the donors who got refunds learn to verify before contributing? Will disability advocates adjust their approach to vetting cases before championing them?
Where We Stand Now
As of this writing, here’s what we know for certain:
- Imarah Aaliyah Bryan was arrested twice: once at the airport for battery, once at Target for petty theft
- She spent 50 days in jail and received a no-contest plea deal
- Video from her airport arrest shows her appearing competent and non-compliant
- Video from her court appearance shows her appearing cognitively impaired
- A GoFundMe raised over $5,600, which was refunded after the airport video surfaced
- Accusations of fraud and “Oscar-worthy acting” are spreading across social media
- The disability community feels betrayed if the impairment was exaggerated
- No official investigation has been announced regarding potential fraud
What we don’t know:
- Whether her courtroom demeanor was genuine stress/fear or calculated performance
- Whether there will be legal consequences
The Final Word
Two weeks ago, Imarah Aaliyah Bryan was a symbol of everything wrong with how our justice system treats vulnerable people. Today, she’s being called a scammer who manipulated the public’s compassion for personal gain.
The truth likely lies somewhere in the nuance that social media hates the gray area between pure victim and calculated con artist. Maybe she does have some cognitive challenges that manifest under stress. Maybe she genuinely panicked in court. Maybe the airport situation was her at her worst, and the courtroom was her at her most vulnerable.
Or maybe the skeptics are right, and this was a performance designed to tug at heartstrings and open wallets.
What’s certain is that thousands of people feel deceived, the disability community feels exploited, and the next person with a genuine need for help will face more skepticism because of this case.
As one commenter perfectly summarized:
“This is why we can’t have nice things. Because some people ruin it for everyone who actually needs help.”
The airport video is out there now. The damage is done. And Imarah Aaliyah Bryan’s story has gone from inspiring to infuriating in a matter of weeks.
Whether she deserves an Oscar or an apology remains to be seen.
